India vs the World: Public Library Spending Per Capita
Comparing India's national average and top-performing state (Goa) against countries with documented public library expenditure data. Use the toggle to switch between nominal USD and PPP-adjusted international dollars.
Currency view:
What PPP means: In nominal USD, India's ₹15.30 = $0.18 — making the gap with Finland look like 367×. In PPP (purchasing power parity) terms — adjusting for what money actually buys in each country — it becomes $0.78, narrowing the gap to ~80×. Both framings are valid: nominal shows raw cash committed; PPP shows relative public investment effort. Either way, the gap is vast.
⚠️ Goa (₹140/capita = $1.69 nominal / $7.18 PPP) skews India's national average upward by ~12%. Excluding Goa, India avg = ₹13.40 ($0.16 nominal / $0.69 PPP).
80×
India spends 80× less than Finland per person, even after PPP adjustment
$0.78
India avg per capita in PPP international dollars (2020–21)
$7.18
Goa (best Indian state) in PPP $ — still below UK's $22
$0.013
Bihar (worst Indian state) in PPP $ — less than 2 paise per person
State-by-State Library Expenditure Tracker
Per-capita public library expenditure (₹) across 31 Indian states and UTs, 2014–15 to 2020–21. Click any state row to see its 7-year trend. Green badge = state has a Public Library Act.
Show year:
Sort by:
Filter:
State trend
All States — Full Data Table
| State / UT ↕ | Library Act | 2014–15 (₹) | 2017–18 (₹) | 2020–21 (₹) | 7-yr Change |
|---|
RRRLF Central Grants — Trend & State Distribution
Raja Rammohun Roy Library Foundation (RRRLF) grant data. Historical trend (2003–2023) by year of institution; plus 2021–25 year-wise state breakdown from Rajya Sabha Q.1316, 31 July 2025. Total released 2021–24: ₹76.7 crore.
Annual Grant Flow (₹ Lakhs) — Historical Trend
The 2012 inflection point: Grants surged from an average of ₹395 lakhs/year (pre-2012) to ₹1,444 lakhs/year (post-2012) — a 3.7× jump, coinciding with the launch of the National Mission on Libraries (NML). The 2022 peak of ₹2,680 lakhs was followed by a drop in 2023. New Parliament data (Q.1316, July 2025) shows year-wise state releases of ₹2,490 lakh (2021-22), ₹1,571 lakh (2022-23), ₹2,374 lakh (2023-24) — volatile but active.
₹2,490 Lk
2021-22 — Released to states. Maharashtra & West Bengal dominate.
₹0 Released
Assam (2023-24): ₹47.4L sanctioned but nothing disbursed. Bihar same.
Gujarat
Consistently top recipient: 1,526–2,039 libraries/year, ₹3–4 crore annually.
Jharkhand
Zero RRRLF grants 2021–25, despite 2 NML-sanctioned libraries. Policy gap confirmed by 2016 Lok Sabha answer.
State-wise RRRLF Release — 2023-24
(₹ Lakhs, source: RS Q.1316)
2023-24 concentration: Just 4 states — Tamil Nadu, Maharashtra, Gujarat, and Uttar Pradesh — absorbed 70% of all RRRLF releases. 18 of 36 states/UTs received ₹0 from RRRLF in 2023-24. Assam was sanctioned ₹47.4 lakhs but released nothing. Jharkhand, Kerala, Punjab, Bihar remain absent or near-zero for multiple consecutive years.
Cumulative Grants Over Time (₹ Lakhs)
The Legislation Paradox: Does a Library Law Mean Actual Spending?
14 of 36 states/UTs have enacted Public Library Acts. The data shows a surprisingly weak relationship between having a law and actually spending on libraries. 10 of 14 act-states spend below the national average.
Act States vs No-Act States — Average Per-Capita Spending by Year
Legislation correlates weakly with spending. States with library acts spend on average only 1.4× more than states without — far less than one would expect. The effect is driven by outliers like Goa, Karnataka (historically) and Andhra Pradesh. Remove these and the gap narrows further. Having a law is necessary but clearly not sufficient.
The Paradox in Detail — 2020–21 Per-Capita vs Library Act Status
Has Library Act
No Library Act
National Average (₹15.30)
10 of 14
Act-states spending below national average of ₹15.30/capita
4 states
Without any Library Act that still spend above national average (Puducherry, Arunachal Pradesh, Sikkim, Mizoram)
Chhattisgarh
Has a Library Act (2006) but spends just ₹1.22/capita — 12× below national average
Maharashtra
Act since 1967 (57 years!) but spends ₹10.14/capita — still below average
State Library Report Card — How Does Your State Perform?
Every state graded A–F across four dimensions: per-capita spending, library legislation, RRRLF grant utilization, and NML participation. Data sources: Ministry of Culture 2020-21, Parliament Q.1316 (2025), NML Scheme Annexures.
Scoring methodology: Per-capita spend (50 pts) · Library Act (20 pts) · RRRLF utilization 2021-24 (20 pts) · NML participation (10 pts). Grade: A ≥85 · B ≥70 · C ≥55 · D ≥40 · F <40
Write to Your MP — Make Your Voice Count
Select your state to generate a personalised, data-backed letter to your Member of Parliament calling for stronger library investment. Copy, print, or email it directly to your MP via the Lok Sabha / Rajya Sabha grievance portals.
✉️
Select your state above to generate a personalised advocacy letter
Other Advocacy Actions
📨
Tag your MP on social media
Share the India Library Spend Tracker dashboard with your state's statistics. Use #LibrariesForIndia and #NationalLibraryPolicy
🏛
Parliamentary Standing Committee
Write to the Standing Committee on Education, Women, Children, Youth & Sports — they have jurisdiction over the Ministry of Culture's library budget.
📰
Pitch to journalists
Share this dashboard with education reporters at The Hindu, Indian Express, and Wire. The state-wise inequity data is a ready-made story — no National Library Policy in 77 years of independence.
Parliament 2025: What MPs Are Asking About Libraries
Analysis of Lok Sabha & Rajya Sabha questions from the July–August 2025 budget session. 7 Q&A documents analysed covering NML scheme status, RRRLF allocations, and rural library gaps. Data sourced from official Ministry of Culture replies.
National Mission on Libraries (NML) — Current Status
64
Libraries sanctioned under NML across all states/UTs
₹7,872 Lk
Total sanctioned (central + state share combined)
₹5,807 Lk
Total released (74% of sanctioned) — central ₹4,307L + state ₹890L
26%
Of sanctioned amount remains unreleased — ₹2,065 lakh stuck in pipeline
Source: Lok Sabha Unstarred Q.†2365 (04.08.2025, MP: Bharadwaj) & Q.†4081 (18.08.2025, MP: Thakur) — Ministry of Culture. The government confirmed that digitization of public libraries was deferred as a "state subject", deflecting central responsibility. By Aug 2025, ₹5,678 lakh (98% of released) had been utilised by states.
Indore, MP
₹87L sanctioned, only ₹43.67L released (50%). One of largest release gaps in NML. (Q.*120, Starred, 28.07.2025)
Khandwa, MP
₹73.20L sanctioned, ₹65.59L released (90% release rate — model case). Same question, MP: Sharma.
Jharkhand
In NML list (Dhanbad + Palamau libraries), but near-zero RRRLF grants 2021–25. 2016 answer explicitly said "No plan for rural libraries in Jharkhand." Consistent neglect.
Goa
India's highest per-capita state spend (₹140/capita) but NML utilization near zero — relies entirely on own funds. State self-sufficiency model.
RRRLF Allocation Deep-Dive — Rajya Sabha Q.1316 (31.07.2025)
Raised by Dr. V. Sivadasan (RS). Ministry of Culture tabled full state-wise financial data 2014-15 through 2024-25 — the most granular RRRLF data ever tabled in Parliament. Key findings:
Gujarat — Perpetual #1
1,526–2,039 libraries/year; ₹3–4 crore annually; 2021–24. 5 different schemes utilised. Benefits from strong state library infrastructure + proactive RRRLF applications.
The Zero-Release Problem
Assam 2023-24: ₹47.4L sanctioned, ₹0 released. Bihar 2023-24: ₹2.5L sanctioned, ₹0 released. Telangana 2022-23: ₹3L sanctioned, ₹0 released. Funds approved but unspent.
Erratic State Participation
West Bengal: 2,501 libraries in 2021-22, dropped to 3–11 in 2022-24. Maharashtra: 12,472 in 2021-22 (huge!), only 416 in 2024-25. No multi-year planning evident.
| State | 2021-22 ₹L | 2022-23 ₹L | 2023-24 ₹L | 2024-25 ₹L |
|---|
All figures in ₹ Lakhs (released). — = not present in data (₹0). 2024-25 partial year as of July 2025. Source: RS Q.1316 Annexure-I.
The Silence of 9 Years: What Parliament Has & Hasn't Said
2016 — Lok Sabha Q.3657 (Lekhi & Paatle)
Ministry of Culture on record: "No plan for promoting libraries in rural areas including Jharkhand under NML." Digitization described as state subject. Sets tone for near-decade of inaction.
2017–2024 — Sparse parliamentary interest
Library questions rare in Parliament. RRRLF data tabled but not scrutinised. NML implementation proceeds without debate. Regional inequity deepens.
Jul–Aug 2025 — 4 library questions in one session
Q.†2365, Q.*120 (Starred!), Q.†4081 in Lok Sabha + Q.1316 in Rajya Sabha — unusually dense. MPs from MP, Bihar, and RS probing NML utilization and RRRLF state-wise data for first time. Signals growing political interest.
What's still not being asked
No questions yet on: per-capita spending equity across states, the 22 states with zero releases in 2023-24, India's standing vs international benchmarks, or a National Library Policy (proposed repeatedly since 1980s, never enacted).